Living Rissho Ankoku RonA commentary
|
The Transmission of Buddhism to East Asia and the
West
III. Slandering the True Dharma
Angry, the Traveler Frowned Deeply and Asked the
Master:
WNSD1: p. 113 - 114, WND: p. 10 - 11
The next section begins with the guest who is now flustered by the
assertions of the host in the last section. The guest recounts key events that
history and legend describe as the introduction of Buddhism into China and
Japan. The first reference is to the Chinese Emperor Ming, the second emperor of
the Later Han dynasty (25-220 C.E.) who lived from 28-75 C.E. and supposedly
dreamed of a golden man floating over his garden. His counselors told him that
in the western region (India) a great sage had been born many hundreds of years
ago called the Buddha. The emperor sent 18 envoys to India to bring back the
Buddha's teachings and in response two monks returned with Buddhist sutras and
images on the back of a white horse in the year 67 C.E. In commemoration of this
the emperor established the White Horse Temple. Of course, this legend is a
romanticized version of the introduction of Buddhism to China in the first
century. Buddhist merchants and maybe even monks may have unofficially been
traveling into China along the silk route long before then. There may have even
been Buddhist enclaves in China already at the time this story supposedly took
place. In any case, Buddhism was brought into China very early on and was (at
least at first) welcomed by the imperial court itself as well as the
intelligentsia.
In Japan, things did not proceed so smoothly. It was introduced to the
Japanese Emperor Kimmei in 538 C.E. when the ruler of Paekche (one of the three
kingdoms on the Korean peninsula which would eventually be united into one
country) sent the emperor an image of the Buddha. The emperor gave it to the
Soga clan who wished to give this new and potentially potent form of foreign
magick a try. The Mononobe clan, however, opposed it and claimed this foreign
superstition would anger the kami, the
Japanese gods. Of course this religious debate was also wrapped up in the
conflicting ambitions of these two rival clans and they eventually went to war.
In the end, the Soga won, and the Empress Suiko embraced Buddhism after her
brother Emperor Yomei passed away. Her nephew, the son of Yomei, was Prince
Shotoku (574-622) and it was he who wrote Japan's first constitution, which
specifically states that all should take the threefold refuge in the Buddha,
Dharma, and Sangha. Prince Shotoku is also credited with writing commentaries on
the Lotus Sutra, the Vimalakirti Sutra, and the Queen
Shrimala Sutra. From this time on Buddhism was firmly established as the
state religion of Japan along with Shinto.
The guest also refers to the lineage of Shariputra who meditated on the
moon atop Eagle Peak and the adherents of Haklenayashas. Haklenayashas was the
23rd patriarch of Buddhism in India after Shakyamuni Buddha according to an
apocryphal lineage of patriarchs originating in the T'ien-t'ai school and since
championed by Zen Buddhism with the addition of several patriarchs and the
extension of the system into China with Bodhidharma and his successors. In this
context however, the lineage of Shariputra seems to refer to practitioners of
meditation while the adherents of Haklenayashas refers to transmission of the
teaching.
In any case, from the guestÂ’s point of view, Buddhism has been firmly
established throughout East Asia, and all people revere it and both its
practices and doctrines seem to be alive and well. So he wonders how the host
can claim that Buddhism is being neglected and slandered to the point of
karmically endangering the country?
One might wonder at this point, what the guest or the host would make of
the state of Buddhism in the USA today. In this country only a small minority
actually practice Buddhism. The vast majority has a passing familiarity with the
Dalai Lama or Zen, and a good number of people see it as a pagan superstition at
odds with Christianity. Far from being the universally respected state religion
of Nichiren's time, Buddhism is very much the province of ethnic minorities (who
themselves often leave it behind as they assimilate into the mainstream) and an
even smaller group of converts who are unhappy or otherwise dissatisfied with
the mainstream religions of this culture. Some even associate Buddhism with the
taking of psychedelic drugs or even tantric sex practices that would have been
unimaginable to the majority of people in Nichiren's day. On the positive side,
forms of Buddhism from all over Asia are meeting in the USA for the first time.
In addition, books (even those expounding previously esoteric and/or oral
teachings) are easy to get in bookstores or online. In addition, the population
is almost universally literate and more or less educated well enough to
understand Buddhism on a conceptual level. Until the 20th century Buddhism had
never encountered such a literate, well-educated, religiously and ethnically
diverse and prosperous culture as the one it has encountered in the USA. So
right at this point in the Rissho Ankoku
Ron we can see the huge gulf between the assumptions which drive this
treatise and the actual conditions of Buddhism in our own day. This must be
taken into account as we read further in the Rissho Ankoku Ron and Nichiren's writings in general.
More Articles by Rev. Ryuei
|
|